Systematic exclusion from medical research leaves expectant and nursing mothers facing unmanaged risks without evidence-based treatment options.
The Stark Numbers
You’re pregnant and need medication – but chances are, that drug has never been properly tested on someone in your condition. New analysis reveals pregnant women were included in just 1.1% of trials submitted for regulatory approval between 2019 and 2023. For breastfeeding women, it’s even worse at 0.6%.
The European Medicines Agency’s Clinical Trials Information System shows less than 0.4% of trials currently submitted in the EU include pregnant people. That figure drops to a shocking 0.1% for those who are breastfeeding.
A Legacy of Fear
This exclusion isn’t accidental. It stems from the thalidomide tragedy and diethylstilbestrol scandals of decades past, when pregnancy became viewed primarily through a risk-management lens rather than considering the evidence gaps this creates.
But the landscape is changing. Both the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration have now adopted guidelines to support ethical inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding women in clinical trials. The World Health Organization has joined this push, recognising that exclusion often causes more harm than carefully managed participation.
Why It Matters Now
Pregnancy and breastfeeding fundamentally alter how the body processes medications. These physiological changes affect drug absorption, distribution, and elimination – yet without trial data, doctors are prescribing “off-label” based on educated guesswork rather than evidence.
The reasons for historical exclusion remain powerful: perceived risks to the foetus, complex ethical considerations, liability concerns, and frankly, low commercial incentives for pharmaceutical companies. Yet this leaves women as what researchers call “therapeutic orphans” – forced to choose between untested treatments or forgoing needed care entirely.
Research suggests many pregnant women would actually participate in trials if properly informed about the risks and benefits. The choice, as medical experts now frame it, is no longer between protection and participation, but between managed risk with evidence and unmanaged risk without it.
Recent initiatives are beginning to address these gaps through collaborative research networks, post-marketing registries, and new regulatory frameworks designed to generate safety data ethically.
Source: @bmj_latest
Key Takeaways
- Only 1.1% of recent clinical trials included pregnant women, with breastfeeding women in just 0.6%
- Historical exclusion from research creates dangerous evidence gaps in medication safety
- New regulatory guidelines from EMA and FDA support ethical inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding women in trials
What This Means for Kent Residents
Pregnant and breastfeeding women across Kent face the same evidence gaps when seeking treatment through local NHS trusts like East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust and Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust. While these hospitals conduct clinical trials, they rarely include expectant or nursing mothers, perpetuating the cycle of uncertainty. If you’re pregnant or breastfeeding and have concerns about medication safety, contact NHS 111 or speak with your maternity team – though be aware that limited trial data may restrict the evidence-based options available to you.
Test Your Knowledge
5 questions


Arsenal
Manchester City
Manchester United
Aston Villa
Liverpool
Chelsea
Brentford
Bournemouth
Brighton
Everton
Sunderland
Fulham
Crystal Palace
Newcastle
Leeds
Nottingham Forest
West Ham
Tottenham
Burnley
Wolves
Coventry
Millwall
Ipswich
Southampton
Middlesbrough
Hull City
Wrexham
Derby
Norwich
Bristol City
QPR
Sheffield Utd
Watford
Birmingham
Swansea
Preston
Stoke City
Portsmouth
Charlton
West Brom
Blackburn
Oxford United
Leicester
Sheffield Wednesday
Lincoln
Cardiff
Bolton
Bradford
Stockport County
Stevenage
Plymouth
Luton
Huddersfield
Reading
Wycombe
Barnsley
Doncaster
Mansfield Town
Wigan
Blackpool
Peterborough
Burton Albion
Leyton Orient
AFC Wimbledon
Exeter City
Rotherham
Port Vale
Northampton
Bromley
Milton Keynes Dons
Cambridge United
Salford City
Notts County
Swindon Town
Chesterfield
Grimsby
Barnet
Crewe
Oldham
Walsall
Colchester
Fleetwood Town
Bristol Rovers
Accrington ST
Cheltenham
Gillingham
Shrewsbury
Crawley Town
Tranmere
Newport County
Barrow
Harrogate Town
York
Rochdale
Carlisle
Boreham Wood
Scunthorpe
Southend
Forest Green
FC Halifax Town
Hartlepool
Woking
Tamworth
Wealdstone
Boston United
Altrincham
Solihull Moors
Yeovil Town
Gateshead
Sutton Utd
Eastleigh
Aldershot Town
Brackley Town
Morecambe
Braintree
Truro City
AFC Fylde
South Shields
Kidderminster Harriers
Macclesfield
Scarborough Athletic
Chester
Buxton
Merthyr Town
Darlington 1883
Spennymoor Town
AFC Telford United
Marine
Worksop Town
Radcliffe
Southport
Chorley
Oxford City
Bedford Town
King's Lynn Town
Curzon Ashton
Alfreton Town
Hereford
Peterborough Sports
Leamington
Worthing
AFC Hornchurch
Dorking Wanderers
Hemel Hempstead Town
Torquay
Ebbsfleet United
Weston-super-Mare
Maidenhead
Maidstone Utd
Chelmsford City
Chesham United
AFC Totton
Dagenham & Redbridge
Tonbridge Angels
Horsham
Salisbury
Slough Town
Hampton & Richmond
Farnborough
Dover
Bath City
Chippenham Town
Enfield Town
Eastbourne Borough
