Council scorecard

Folkestone & Hythe District Council

Type
district
Population
~110k
Council website
www.folkestone-hythe.gov.uk

Scorecard

Methodology published 2026-05-18. Pending cells reflect data collection in progress, not methodology uncertainty — they will populate as the underlying data is gathered.

Refuse collection

Missed bin reports, recycling rates, complaint resolution time

63 C

Partial Metric 1 score reflecting recycling rate (component 2 of 4, 30% weight) only; the three other components (missed-bin reports per 100k, complaint resolution time, service consistency) remain pending data ingest. F&H 2023-24 recycling rate ~46% — above the Kent average (41.7%) and the England average (~44%). Strong on the recycling component.

as of 2024 · source

Complaints handling

Volume, response times, LGSCO upheld findings

Pending

Score pending — data collection in progress per the published methodology (2026-05-18)

FOI response

Average response time, refusal/exemption rate, compliance with 20-day statutory deadline

Pending

Score pending — data collection in progress per the published methodology (2026-05-18)

Financial health & budget discipline

Revenue budget variance, capital programme delivery, reserves + Section 114 risk, external auditor VfM judgment, council tax positioning + trajectory vs national

30 F

Partial Metric 4 score reflecting council tax positioning (component 5 of 6) only; the five other components (revenue budget variance, capital programme delivery, reserves + Section 114 risk, external auditor VfM judgement, multi-year tax trajectory) remain pending data ingest. Folkestone & Hythe has held the highest district Band D council tax precept in Kent for 23 consecutive years (per published comparative analysis). Positioning at the worst end of the district-tier comparator group.

as of 2026-04 · source

Transparency

Open data publication, councillor expenses, contract register, committee paper publication

Pending

Score pending — data collection in progress per the published methodology (2026-05-18)

Planning

Application approval ratios, appeal-overturn rate, determination time vs statutory targets

Pending

Score pending — data collection in progress per the published methodology (2026-05-18)

Education & children's services

SEND/EHCP statutory processing, SEND tribunal LA-loss rate, children's services Ofsted rating, school transport delivery (county + unitary only)

N/A

Education and children's services are not a district/borough function. The county council (or, for Medway, the unitary authority) holds this remit.

Safeguarding & LADO

LADO referral handling, multi-agency safeguarding (MASH) timeliness, Section 47 enquiry compliance, independent safeguarding audit findings (county + unitary only)

N/A

Safeguarding is the statutory function of the county council or unitary authority via the LADO (Local Authority Designated Officer) and multi-agency safeguarding hub.

Manifesto delivery (Trust)

KLN tracks what the controlling party promised at the most recent election vs what was actually delivered. KEPT/PARTIAL/BROKEN/PENDING/OUT_OF_SCOPE categorisation.

50 D

Trust score: 3 categorised public issues (no scoreable pledges yet).

as of 2026-05-21

Top public issues for Folkestone & Hythe residents

This is editorial assessment, not a metric score. Each issue carries an alignment tag — ALIGNED (council in step with residents), MIXED (some action falls short), COUNTERACTING (council against residents on this), or SILENT (no clear position). KLN-curated. Council positions added verbatim where provided. Right-of-reply opens with initial publication.

  1. 🟡Mixed

    Princes Parade development — cancel vs proceed

    The Princes Parade leisure-and-housing scheme has been a contentious resident issue for years. Local opposition is high; previous administration backed delivery.

    Council position

    Greens/Lib Dems 2023 coalition committed to cancel the unwanted Princes Parade development.

    KLN assessment

    Commitment to cancel is a statement; cabinet decision + planning unwind status is the action evidence and to be confirmed. Per the "actions, not statements" principle: MIXED until cancellation is operationalised.

  2. 🟡Mixed

    Homelessness + cost of living

    F&H has visible street homelessness + winter sleeping pressure. Residents expect year-round response.

    Council position

    Greens 2023 manifesto committed to year-round homelessness action plan + community-group partnerships.

    KLN assessment

    Commitment in intent; action plan publication + measurable street-count reductions are the action evidence. Per the "actions, not statements" principle: MIXED.

  3. 🟡Mixed

    Coastal erosion + flooding defence

    F&H coastline + low-lying marshes face erosion + flood risk; Environment Agency sea defences are partial.

    Council position

    F&H DC role is partner + statutory consultee on EA-led schemes; lobbying for funding the gap.

    KLN assessment

    Mixed: council operates within constrained authority. Lobbying for EA funding is the channel.

How this scorecard works

Each metric is scored 0-100 and banded A through F. We do NOT aggregate to a single overall ranking — combining unrelated performance areas would mislead. See the methodology page for full details, thresholds, and data sources.

Spot an error or have data we should add for Folkestone & Hythe? editor@kentlocalnews.co.uk.